Unfortunately, a common trait among journalists, politicians and actually, lets face it, most of the population, is that they’re not very good at math. An unfortunate side-effect of this is that we make very poor arguments from data.
A journal paper on the use of probability in the debate on Atheism, providing a defense against Richard Dawkins’ book, The God Delusion.
Why I am not convinced by the climate change alarmists. My reasons, are not all to do with science…
A N Wilsons biography of Charles Darwin was a surprise. Even to A N Wilson. He never expected to discover that, well, “Darwin was wrong”.
John Lennox provided a quick read. A summary of the best arguments against the “new atheism” and the view that it takes of science.
Perhaps you’ve heard of the “god of the gaps” objection against religion. That God is an idea superstitious minds use to fill gaps in knowledge. But is it truly more reasonable for us to fill the gaps with science than with God?